“Build relationships” may be one of the most repeated pieces of advice in education. It is also one of the least operationalized. Most school professionals already believe relationships matter. The harder question is what an adult should actually do when the relationship is being tested.
The moment is often small
The moment may not look dramatic. A student avoids eye contact. A routine redirection is ignored. A hallway exchange becomes sharper than expected. A student who is normally talkative becomes quiet. An adult notices their own frustration rising. These ordinary interactions are where school climate is experienced, where trust is strengthened or weakened, and where professional judgment becomes visible.
Broad principles do not always transfer automatically
Trauma-informed education encourages adults to consider context and avoid responses that intensify harm. Restorative approaches emphasize relationships, voice, accountability, and repair. SEL identifies competencies such as self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making. PBIS and MTSS emphasize prevention, explicit practices, data-informed support, and increasing levels of responsiveness. These bodies of work are deeply valuable. But an adult in a fast-moving interaction may still need a compact cognitive scaffold.
The implementation problem
Professional learning can increase understanding without producing consistent practice. Research on SEL implementation highlights the influence of teacher readiness, leadership, school climate, resources, peer support, coaching, and sustained implementation structures. A single training may introduce an idea. Practice, reflection, feedback, and organizational support help turn an idea into behavior.
Not one more thing
The goal should not be to add another program to an already crowded plate. The goal should be to make existing commitments easier to access in the moment. A useful tool would need to be brief enough to remember, flexible enough to work across roles, clear enough to practice, and bounded enough not to replace policies, crisis procedures, individualized supports, or professional judgment.
A question worth studying
Could a short interaction process help adults pause before reacting, distinguish observations from assumptions, preserve dignity while maintaining expectations, and close interactions with clarity? That is a research question, not a conclusion. It is also the question that led me to organize four actions into a practice practice: Steady, Scan, Connect, and Close.
A careful introduction
The SSCC Practice™ is an evidence-informed adult interaction practice currently undergoing systematic evaluation. Its component principles are grounded in established scholarship. The specific sequence has not yet been shown to produce particular outcomes. That is precisely why its development should be transparent and why research must accompany its implementation.
Relationships matter. But values become culture through repeated behavior. The next step is not simply telling adults to connect. It is helping them examine what connection, regulation, accountability, and follow-through look like in the moments when they are most difficult.
Until next time, keep building safer schools, one relationship at a time.
← Previous: Who Is Developing the Adults? · Back to all articles · Next: Introducing the SSCC Practice™ →